|

Reference Library
Who says Texas Longhorn cattle won't feed out?
Just ask Dick Robbins, Anchor D Ranch, Belvidere, KS.
For the past five years, Robbins has participated in the Pratt Area Extension
Futurity at Pratt Feeders, Inc., Pratt. KS. According to Paul Hartman,
County Extension Agent, the purpose of the futurity is to provide area
cattle producers with data concerning live animal performance and carcass
traits of steers produced from their herds. It helps the producer evaluate
the kind of cattle he wants to fit into his livestock program and provides
another marketing alternative by retaining ownership of steers. The unique
thing about the futurity is that carcass traits are compiled and evaluated
on each individual animal so that producers bring steers by different
breeds, sires, and dams, and will let him genetically evaluate the best
producing animal within his herd.
This year Robbins placed three groups of Texas Longhorn cross steers
on test. The first group (Simmental bulls on Texas Longhorn cross cows)
had an average daily gain (ADO) of 3.39 with a hot carcass weight of 740
lbs., dressing Out at 64.13%. All quality graded choice or select. Most
of the steers yield graded 1 or 2. Cost/cwt gain was $45.71.
The other two groups were fullblood Texas Longhorn X fullblood Simmental.
Together they had a final ADG of 2.72, dressing at 62.49. All 23 quality
graded choice or select, again with yield grades of 1 or 2.
It was also noted that the Texas Longhorn cross steers had the lowest
hospital bill of any animals entered.
Robbins uses the data collected from the futurity as a marketing tool.
"More folks should take advantage of tests like this," says
Robbins. It gives you an idea how your breeding program is doing and gives
other folks concrete evidence of what Texas Longhorns can do in their
herd."
Texas Longhorn Trails February 1992
Feeding the Cow Herd
Roy Burns and John Johns
Feed is the biggest single cost of maintaining the beef herd. You must
meet the nutrient needs of the beef cow if you want to obtain a high percent
calf crop with heavy weaning weights in a short period of time. However,
you must meet these nutrient needs in a cost-effective manner to achieve
profitability in your operation.
Cattle belong to a group of animals known as ruminants; that is, they
possess a four-compartment stomach, the major part of which is the rumen.
The rumen is a large fermentation vat with a population of microorganisms
(bacteria and protozoa) that allows digestion of large amounts of roughage.
The cow uses the end products of this microbial fermentation. To work
properly, the digestive system of the cow needs a balance of essential
nutrients. Since ruminants have the unique ability to digest large amounts
of roughage, base the feeding program for your cow herd on forages adapted
to your area.
Essential Nutrients
Nutrients are essential for animal maintenance, growth, reproduction,
milk production, and fattening. Nutrients fall into the following classes:
energy, protein, minerals, vitamins, and water.
Energy is the major nutrient requirement for beef cattle. It is commonly
expressed as TDN (total digestible nutrients), NE (net energy), or ME
(metabolizable energy). Both carbohydrates and fats are in the energy
group. Think of energy as the fuel a cow uses for grazing, producing milk,
maintaining temperature, growing, reproducing, digesting, and voiding
body wastes. Most of this fuel comes from forages and roughage products.
With proper amounts of protein and minerals, the rumen can obtain energy
from some feeds that are useless to non-ruminants.
TDN is the measure of energy commonly used for grazing beef cattle. TDN
values are readily available for most forages. Net energy is most widely
used for dry lot growing and finishing of cattle. NE is a more precise
measurement because it is divided into maintenance and gain; also, it
might be used more in the future.
Protein is made up of many amino acids, which are used in the body as
"building blocks" for muscle and other body tissue. These amino
acids contain nitrogen, along with other elements. Because cattle have
rumen microorganisms, they can use either natural protein or nonprotein
nitrogen (NPN) compounds (such as urea and biuret) in their diets to meet
their protein requirements. The microorganisms break down much of the
dietary protein and synthesize into microbial protein, which is digested
by the cow.
Lightweight, growing cattle, such as young calves, cannot adequately
use NPN and can benefit from natural protein sources (such as soybean
meal). NPN is generally cheaper than natural protein supplements and is
best used to reduce feed costs for older cattle on higher energy diets.
Low quality roughages do not contain enough energy to permit rumen microorganisms
to use NPN. Use supplements high in natural protein with low quality roughages,
even for older cattle.
Protein is generally expressed as crude protein on feed tags and in feed
analyses. Crude protein is calculated as nitrogen (N) x 6.25 to make it
"equivalent" to true protein. However, not all nitrogen can
be converted to true protein. Protein needs are more precisely expressed
as metabolizable protein. The use of metabolizable protein recognizes
that rations must meet the nitrogen needs of the rumen microbes for optimal
fermentation as well as the protein needs of the animal. Metabolizable
protein can be further divided into degradable (DIP-degradable intake
protein) and undegradable (UIP-undegradable intake protein) in the rumen.
Minerals are an essential part of the beef cow's nutritional needs. The
normal diet in Kentucky provides most of them. However, a good mineral
supplement should be available to cows at all times.
Phosphorus is the mineral most likely to be deficient for cattle in Kentucky.
The need for phosphorus increases during lactation (milk production) and
growth. Generally, forages are low in phosphorus and grains are high in
phosphorus. Phosphorus is stored in the bones and has several functions
in the body. Phosphorus deficiencies can cause poor growth, reduced appetite,
poor digestibility of feedstuff, and poor reproduction.
Lack of calcium is generally not a problem. Most forages, especially
legumes, are high in calcium, and mineral supplements generally contain
considerable amounts of calcium. Keep the calcium-phosphorus ratio in
the total diet from becoming too wide. A ratio of about 2-to-I is ideal;
the ratio should not be wider than about 5-to- 1. Low calcium is most
often found in cattle fed high grain diets with little roughage.
Cattle might need supplemental magnesium under certain conditions. Grass
tetany (low blood magnesium) can be a severe problem for lactating brood
cows grazing cool-season pasture, such as fescue, during early spring.
Prevent grass tetany by supplying adequate levels of magnesium (about
20 to 22 grams) in the miner M mix.
Salt (sodium and chlorine) is deficient in the forage diet and generally
makes up a large part of the mineral supplement. Trace minerals (microminerals),
such as selenium, copper, zinc, cobalt, iron, iodine, and manganese, also
should be in the mineral mix.
Chelated minerals also are available in many commercial mixes. Chelation
can alter the availability of minerals. If the bioavailability of a mineral
is increased, lower dietary concentrations can be used. Compare the costs
of chelated mineral sources to inorganic mineral sources; it might be
more cost effective to simply increase the amount of inorganic minerals
used. (Some chelates may affect performance in other ways. Research in
this area is continuing.)
Many good commercial mineral supplements are available. The mineral supplement
needed varies depending on the time of year, the cow's stage of production,
other ingredients in the diet, and, perhaps, breed and the geographic
area of the state (some regions might be marginal or deficient in certain
microminerals). Table 7-1 illustrates the nutrient specifications of mineral
supplements fed for the past few years to the UK-Princeton beef herd.
Vitamins belong to two groups: fat-soluble (A, D, E, and K) and water-soluble
(B vitamins and vitamin C). Bacteria in the rumen and intestines make
the necessary water-soluble vitamins and vitamin K. Vitamin D is synthesized
in the skin when animals are exposed to sunlight. Vitamin E is found in
most feeds. This leaves vitamin A.
Vitamin A can be synthesized in the body from carotene, which is found
in plants. Vitamin A deficiency is rare when good quality roughages are
fed to beef cattle. Vitamin A deficiencies can occur when the ration consists
of weathered or low quality hay and concentrates low in carotene content,
such as old corn, small grains, or grain sorghums. Cattle that are fed
or that graze highly nitrated forages can have a vitamin A deficiency
due to poor use of carotene.
You can add supplemental vitamin A to the ration or mineral supplement
as a dry, stabilized vitamin A premix, or give it as an injection. An
injection of 1 million lUs prevents deficiency symptoms for two to four
months in cattle. The most common method is to provide a mineral/ vitamin
supplement with approximately 150,000 to 200,000 lUs of vitamin A per
pound.
Table 7-1. Example of Mineral Supplements Fed to the UK-Princeton Beef
Cow Herd
Month of the year
Level Sept-Jan1 Feb-April2 May-Aug1
Salt, % 25-28 15 25-31
Mg, % (from MgO) 2 15 2
Ca, % 12 12 12
P, % 6 5 6
K, % 1 1 1
Cu (no CuO), ppm 800 800 800
Cu (no CuO), ppm 800 800 800
Zn, ppm 2,000 2,000 2,000
Se, ppm 53 26 48
I, ppm 48 48 48
Co, ppm 10 10 10
Vit A, lU/lb 200,000 150,000 200,000
Vit E, U/lb 400 300 400
CTC, mg/lb - - 800
Distiller's dried grains (40 lb/ton), wet molasses (20 lb/ton), and mineral
oil (20 lb/ton).
2 Distiller's dried grains (100 lb/ton), wet molasses (20 lb/ton), and
mineral oil (20 lb/ton).
Water is an essential nutrient for animal life; although, because of
its abundance, it is often overlooked. Clean water is most important for
young, growing calves. Stagnant, dirty water can retard performance and
be a breeding ground for disease. Cattle generally drink about a half
gallon of water per pound of dry matter intake, but this varies considerably
with temperature. Water requirements increase as the temperature rises
and as dry matter intake increases (Table 7-2).
Classification of Feeds
Feedstuffs are generally divided into two broad categories: roughages/forages
and concentrates. Roughages/forages are usually high in fiber and somewhat
low in energy. Concentrates, on the other hand, are low in fiber and high
in energy. Both broad categories are sometimes further divided into energy
and protein feeds. These feedstuffs may require mineral and vitamin supplementation
or feed additives. Figure 7-1 shows various feeds classified according
to their use.
Table 7-2. Total Daily Water Intake (gallons) as Affected by Temperature
and Feed Intake1
Temperature: 40~F 500F 60~F 700F 80~F 900F
Gallons of waterllb dry matter: 0.37 0.40 0.46 0.54 0.62 0.88
500-lb calf (12 lb d.m.) 4.4 4.8 5.5 6.5 7.4 10.6
750-lb preg. heifer (16.6 lb d.m.) 6.1 6.6 7.6 9.0 10.3 14.6
1,100-lb dry preg. cow (20 lb d.m.) 7.4 8.0 9.2 10.8 12.4 17.6
1,100-lb lactating cow (22 lb d.m.) 8.1 8.8 10.1 11.9 13.6 19.4
Adapted from Winchester and Morris, 1956. Water intake rates of cattle.
Journal of Animal Science 15:722.
Various feedstuffs are available for use in beef cattle diets. Brief
descriptions of several ingredients you can use to supplement forage-based
diets follows. Table 7-3 shows nutrient concentration and feed density
of several types of feeds.
Table 7-3. Nutrient Concentration and Bulk Density of Selected Feed Ingredients
Concentration in dry matter
Dry Starch Crude Bypass Bulk
Matter TDN Nem NEg sugars Fat protein protein Ca P density
Feed % % mcalllb mcalllb %CP % 1bift3
Grains
Corn 88 87 0.96 0.64 75 4.2 10 65 0.02 0.30 48
Oats 89 76 0.81 0.52 47 4.6 13 21 0.09 0.40 25
Rye 89 81 0.88 0.58 1.7 12 20 0.07 0.39 45
Wheat 89 88 0.98 0.65 69 2.0 12 0.06 0.40 48
High energy feeds
Hominy 90 92 1.03 0.70 52 5.3 11 44 0.04 0.45 28
Molasses, heavy 78 78 0.79 0.50 60 0.0 9 0 1.10 0.10 78
Rice bran 91 66 0.68 0.38 27 15.8 14 34 0.08 1.68 20
Soybean hulls, grd 91 77 0.82 0.53 14 2.5 14 30 0.63 0.22 20
Wheat middlings 89 82 0.89 0.59 35 4.6 18 24 0.14 1.04 20
Medium protein feeds
Brewer's grains 92 84 0.92 0.61 14 7.4 30 56 0.30 0.60 15
Broiler litter 78 53 0.52 0.16 2.0 25 2.10 1.80 35
Cottonseed, whole 90 94 1.06 0.72 8 18.0 23 39 0.16 0.62 25
Corn gluten teed 90 82 0.89 0.59 30 3.3 24 25 0.20 0.85 30
Distiller's grains 92 87 0.96 0.64 12 9.0 27 47 0.30 0.75 15
High protein feeds
Blood meal 91 66 0.66 0.37 1.3 92 82 0.29 0.23 38
Corn gluten meal 91 89 0.99 0.67 19 2.4 67 60 0.05 0.51 42
Cottonseed meal 91 76 0.81 0.52 12 2.0 47 41 0.21 1.18 42
Feather meal 92 69 0.71 0.43 7 5.0 88 72 0.40 0.60 15
Fish meal 90 72 0.75 0.47 2 8.0 66 63 6.40 3.60 40
Meat and bone meal 93 71 0.74 0.46 10.4 55 53 9.95 5.00 37
Soybean meal 91 87 0.96 0.64 10 1.2 55 30 0.28 0.70 42
Soybeans, whole 88 93 1.04 0.71 10 18.5 40 30 0.27 0.64 48
Source: Kunkle, WE., R.L. Stewart, and WF Brown. Cattle Short Course
Proc. p.89.
Corn is the most widely fed grain. It is used as an energy source and
is low in crude protein, fair in phosphorus, and low in calcium. Corn
is fed in different forms-shelled corn, whole ear corn, and high moisture
corn (20 percent to 34 percent moisture)-and may be processed to different
degrees.
Wheat is about 105 percent the feeding value of corn when it makes up
no more than 50 percent of the beef ration. It is a good feed but can
pack in the stomach, especially when it is finely ground.
Sorghum grain (milo) is about 85 percent to 90 percent the value of corn
for beef cattle. It is lower in energy than corn and more variable in
its protein content. Sorghum grain must be processed for maximum digestibility.
Milo is generally grown as a crop when it is too late to plant corn or
in areas that are susceptible to drought.
Oats are about 85 percent the feeding value of corn because of their
high fiber level. Oats are very palatable and excellent for starting young
calves on feed. You can use oats as a creep feed for calves in a 50-50
mixture with corn.
Rye is the least palatable of all the grains and should not make up more
than one-third of the ration. It tends to
1995. Using byproduct feeds in supplementation programs. 44th Annual
Fla. Beet
Corn-and-cob meal consists of whole ears of corn (cob and grain), ground
to varying degrees of fineness. The mixture is usually about one-fourth
cobs and three-fourths corn grain. It is a good feed for growing calves
because of its increased fiber content.
Many commercial protein supplements are available, and most contain some
of the following ingredients (which also may be fed as the sole protein
supplement).
Soybean meal (SBM) is the most popular of all the natural protein supplements
for cattle. It is the most widely used of all the oilseed meals and is
the standard to which other protein supplements are compared. The amino
acid composition of soybean meal makes it an excellent supplement with
corn, which is deficient in lysine. This amino acid composition is beneficial
to young, growing calves.
Cottonseed meal is not as readily available in Kentucky as SBM and is
lower in its protein content. It is a satisfactory protein supplement
for beef cattle.
Urea and biuret are not proteins but are nitrogen supplemments that can
be converted to protein by rumen microorganisms. The diet should contain
a source of readily fermentable energy (carbon skeletons) to be combined
with ammonia (nitrogen) by the rumen microbes to form protein. Generally,
NPN should not make up more than 1 percent of the total diet or 3 percent
of the concentrate mix.
Liquid urea-containing supplements are popular with some producers because
they can be self-fed from "lick tanks." This makes supplements
from "lick tanks" convenient for producers, but they are generally
expensive in terms of nutrients provided and performance obtained. Some
liquid supplements contain molasses as a palatable carrier for the urea.
While molasses would seem to provide a source of readily fermentable energy
for bacteria to use for protein synthesis, it might reduce forage intake
and/or digestion, which would offset its energy value. Some liquid supplements
now contain byproduct ingredients that contain natural protein, such as
corn steep liquor, brewer's solubles, or fish solubles.
Dried distiller's grains with solubles are a byproduct of the production
of ethyl alcohol. Solubles left over from the fermentation are added to
the grains before they are dried. Corn, the predominant grain, is used
with varying amounts of other grain. Dried distiller's grains with solubles,
if dried properly, are a good source of bypass (undegraded in the rumen)
protein.
Wet distiller's grains are a byproduct of alcohol for "gasohol"
production and contain about 65 percent to 75 percent moisture. The moisture
content limits their use to areas near the place of production.
Corn gluten feed is a byproduct obtained when high fructose corn syrup
is made. It contains about 25 percent crude protein. Corn gluten meal
is higher in protein-about 65 percent.
You can feed whole soybeans to beef cattle as a protein supplement. Do
not feed them at high levels, however, because of their fat content. Limit
them in the diet to replacing the usual protein supplement of calves (usually
2 to 3 pounds), and don't feed in diets with urea.
Soyhulls, the seed coats of soybeans, are removed during oil extraction.
The hulls are high in fiber, which is highly digestible by ruminants.
They also have a lower starch level, resulting in a lower rate of fermentation
and reducing the chance of acidosis. They are very palatable, making them
a good feed for newly weaned calves and for supplementing bulls because
of the reduced chance of founder.
Broiler litter is readily available in areas where broilers are produced.
Broiler litter contains poultry excreta, bedding, and feed waste. Much
of the crude protein in broiler litter is in the form of nonprotein nitrogen,
which is utilized better when combined with moderate to high energy feeds.
Deep-stack litter, and allow it to go through a heat to destroy pathogens
and weed seeds and to eliminate some ammonia, which improves palatability.
Broiler litter is usually mixed with grain in a 50-50 mix and fed to stocker
cattle as a supplement to forages. It can be fed to beef cows at levels
up to 80 percent litter. Broiler litter has a high concentration of minerals,
notably calcium and potassium. Feeding high levels to pregnant cows near
calving can cause milk fever.
Nutritional Requirements
When you build a nutrition program for your cow herd, keep three issues
in mind: fulfilling the nutrient requirements of the cow, responding to
"stress points" that can cause nutrient deficiencies, and making
maximum use of forage supplies while filling gaps with supplemental feed.
Nutrient requirements of the cow vary according to the cow's size, whether
the cow is lactating or dry, the level of milk production, and the stage
of production. Figure 7-2 divides the beef cow's productive year into
periods of differing nutritional requirements according to her stage of
production.
Table 7-4 shows the nutritional requirements of an 1,100-pound beef cow
for each of the production periods. Period 1 (the time between calving
and rebreeding) is the time of greatest nutrient need. Nutritional "stress"
is likely to occur around this time. Probably the greatest stress point
occurs when first calf heifers are being prepared to rebreed after their
first calf. The critical period for the cow herd is from 50 days before
to 80 days after calving. Another problem period is when you are trying
to get yearling heifers to gain adequate amounts so they can breed soon
enough to calve at 24 months of age.
Table 7-5 gives examples of rations for various classes of cattle. You
can use these rations as a guide to planning the feeding program for your
beef herd or when a forage analysis is not available
Table 7-4. Daily Nutrient Requirement for 1,100-lb Beef Cow with Average
Milk Production (15 lb/day)1
Period
Nutrient 1 2 3 4
TDN, lb 13.3 11.5 9.5 11.2
NE, McaI/day 13.5 12.2 9.2 10.3
Protein, lb 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.6
Calcium, g 33 27 17 25
Phosphorus, g 25 22 17 20
Vitamin A, IU 39,000 36,000 25,000 27,000
Adapted from Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Revised edition, 1984.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Winter Feeding the Cow Herd
The cost of winter feeding the cow herd makes up 40 percent to 50 percent
of the total variable costs of producing a weaned calf. Because winter
nutrition is vital to calf health and cow reproduction, you must supply
adequate nutrition while avoiding feed waste.
As shown earlier, cattle in different developmental stages have different
nutrient needs. You can meet these needs by separating the herd into groups
with similar nutrient needs. You also make the most efficient use of feed
resources this way.
The following brief discussions of the production groups will help you
understand their needs. Not all groups are present in all herds, and your
facilities may limit the amount of grouping you can do. If you can only
do limited grouping, separate the animals having the greatest differences
in nutrient needs and feed accordingly.
The mature, dry, pregnant cow in medium flesh has the lowest nutrient
needs: she can use lower quality feed than other groups in the herd. Treat
this as an opportunity to cut feed costs by using such feeds as crop residue,
mature standing grass, or mature hay. Recognize that body condition score
or the amount of flesh the cow is carrying must be adequate if you use
lower quality feeds. However, lower quality feeds are not suitable even
for the mature, dry, pregnant cow if she is thin initially.
Table 7-5. Sample Rations for Various Classes of Beef Cattle
Weaned Heifer Calves (500 lb~1+ lb ADG)
1. High quality pasture + 5 lb corn
2. 5-10 lb grass-legume hay + 5 lb corn
3. 5-10 lb grass hay + 5 lb corn + + lb protein supplement
4. 35 lb corn silage + 1 lb protein supplement
5. 30 lb corn silage + 5 lb alfalfa hay
Bred Yearling Heifers (850 lb-1 to 1-1/2 lb ADG)
1. High quality pasture
2. 20 lb good grass hay
3. 45 lb corn silage + 1 lb protein supplement
4. 25 lb corn silage + 10 lb hay + + lb protein supplement
Dry, Pregnant Cows
1. Low to medium quality pasture
2. 20 lb grass hay
3. 20 lb stalks or straw + 8 lb good hay
4. 20 lb stalks or straw + 21/2 lb corn + 1 lb protein supplement
Dry, Pregnant Cows (last 2 months before calving)
1. Medium to high quality pasture
2. 22 lb of good hay
3. 25-30 lb corn silage + 10 lb legume hay
4. 25-30 lb corn silage + 10 lb grass hay + + lb protein supplement
Lactating Cows (average milk)
1. High quality pasture
2. 25 lb hay
3. 65 lb corn silage + 1 lb protein supplement
4. 55 lb corn silage + 5 lb alfalfa hay
Lactating Cows (heavy milk)
1. High quality pasture + grain if needed for condition
2. 30 lb grass-legume hay + grain if needed for condition
3. 60 lb corn silage + 2+ lb protein supplement
4. 50 lb corn silage + 10 lb alfalfa hay
Young Herd Bulls (yearlings or 2 yr old)
1. High quality pasture + 12 lb corn
2. 20 lb grass-legume hay + 12 lb corn
3. 80 lb corn silage + 2 lb protein supplement
Mature Herd Bulls
1. High quality pasture + grain, if needed for condition
2. 30 lb hay + grain, if needed for condition
3. 70 lb corn silage + 1+ lb protein supplement
Notes: Actual amounts varv depending on quality of forage used. A forage
analysis should be obtained so that rations can be balanced more accurately
Mineral and vitamin supplementation should be included.
Nutrient needs begin to increase in the last third of pregnancy and increase
dramatically after calving when the cow is nursing a calf. Thus, you should
move cows dropping calves to a separate pasture and increase the quantity
and/ or quality of feed. This ensures the best feed to those cattle needing
it most and prevents overfeeding cows calving later in the season.
Feed first and second calf heifers differently than the mature lactating
cow. Unlike the mature cow, their nutrient needs are increased by the
need to continue growing. Provide young cows nursing calves the highest
quality feed.
Replacement heifers, both bred and open, comprise another group in the
herd. Heifers going into their first winter are at the lowest level of
social order in the herd and would certainly be "bossed" by
older cows. In addition, their nutrient requirements for growth demand
a much higher quality feed than that needed by the mature cow.
The bred heifer entering her second winter must be fed sufficiently to
grow and develop the fetus. A higher quality feed than so-called "dry
cow hay" is necessary. Do not to get her too fat or calving difficulties
can occur. If forage quality is high and enough feeding space is available
so that competition does not occur, you do not have to feed Kentuchy.
bred heifers separately from mature, dry, pregnant cows.
The bull is often the forgotten animal in winter feeding, but he should
not be. If the bull is mature and in adequate condition, nutrient needs
are not high. Feed so that the bull maintains body condition. Fattening
the mature bull is a waste of feed and money.
Young bulls are still growing and must be fed accordingly. A high quality
forage, and possibly some concentrate, is necessary for these animals.
If possible, maintain younger bulls in separate lots from mature bulls
for feeding and safety reasons.
Evaluating Nutritional Status with Body Condition Scores
Adequate nutrition from about 50 days before to 80 days after calving
is critical to the cow's ability to rebreed and maintain a 365-day calving
interval. If the cow gets inadequate nutrition or is in poor body condition
at calving and breeding, she will take longer to come into heat and may
require more services per conception.
It is not economical to maintain cows that are too thin to rebreed properly
or those that are too fat. Cows need appropriate fat reserves for the
increase in production during calving and rebreeding to help ensure satisfactory
breeding performance.
Body Condition Scoring (BCS) allows you to judge the adequacy of your
feeding program based on the condition of your cows. This evaluation can
help you plan supplemental feeding programs to maintain adequate productivity.
Body Condition Scores are numbers used to evaluate body energy reserves
of the cow. Most reports suggest a scale from l to 9, with 1 being extremely
thin and 9 being extremely fat. You should at least be able to recognize
the differences in thin (3), marginal (4), and optimum (5, 6, 7) condition
in order to plan the feeding program. Table 7-6 provides a description
of condition scores.
How do you determine body condition? Figure 7-3 shows the areas of the
body that are best for scoring body condition.
Figure 7-3. Anatomical areas which are useful in scoring body condition.
Research and field observations indicate the importance of adequate body
condition for cows from calving through rebreeding. Table 7-7, which shows
the results of five Texas trials involving more than 1,700 cows, illustrates
the effect of body condition at calving on subsequent reproductive performance.
In all instances, cows scoring less than 5 at calving time had the lowest
pregnancy rates, indicating that their condition at calving time is undesirable.
Scores of less than 5 at calving impede reproduction. The body condition
score should be at least 5 or possibly 6. Anything higher than 6 may not
be helpful.
The best way to use condition scoring is to sort cows according to condition
at 90 to 100 days before calving. Grouping cows according to body condition
and nutrient needs can optimize reproductive performance. The goal should
be to have a BCS of 5 or 6 for the herd. Table 7-8 gives guidelines for
maintaining the 5 or 6 optimum condition in a 1,000-pound cow.
Table 7-6. Description of Body Condition Scores (BCS)
Thin condition
1. Emaciated-Emaciated with no detectable fat over backbone, hips, or
ribs. All ribs and bone structures easily visible.
2. Still emaciated but tailhead and ribs are less prominent. Backbone
still sharp but some tissue on it.
3. Ribs still identifiable but not as sharp to the touch. Backbone still
highly visible.
Borderline condition
4. Borderline-Individual ribs no longer obvious. Fore ribs not noticeable.
However, 12th and 13th ribs may still be noticeable particularly in cattle
with big spring of rib. The backbone is still prominent but feels rounded
rather than sharp.
Optimum condition
5. Moderate-Good overall appearance. The 12th and 13th ribs are not visible
unless the animal has been shrunk. Fat cover over the ribs feels spongy.
Area on each side of the tailhead filled but not mounded. The transverse
processes (see Figure 7-3) are not noticeable to the eye. Spaces between
the processes can only be felt with firm pressure.
6. High moderat~A high amount of fat present over the ribs and around
the tailhead. Noticeable sponginess over the foreribs and on each side
of the tailhead. Firm pressure now required to feel the spinous processes.
7. 7. Good-Cow appears fleshy and carries some fat. Spongy fat cover
over the ribs and around the tailhead. Some "patchiness" evident
around the tailhead.
Fat condition
8. Fat-Fleshy and overconditioned. Bone structure disappearing from sight.
Animal taking on a smooth, blocky appearance. Large fat deposits over
ribs, around tailhead, below vulva. Patchy fat.
9. Extremely fat-Wasty, patchy, and blocky. Tailhead and hips buried
in fat. Bone structure no longer visible. Animal's movement may be impaired.
Winter Weather
You also must consider the special problems of cold winter weather. Cold
increases the rate at which feed passes through the digestive tract. Less
time in the digestive tract means less digestion of nutrients. In other
words, a high fiber, lower digestible feed provides even fewer nutrients
in cold winter weather.
Cold weather also increases the cattle's nutrient requirements, especially
for energy. As wind chill drops. below the low critical temperature for
the animal, the amount of energy required for maintenance increases. Thus,
prolonged cold periods decrease the digestion of nutrients from feed and
increase the animal's energy requirements. Producers can cope with long
periods of cold by increasing the quality of the forage being fed or by
substituting concentrates for a portion of the forage.
Certain nutrients, such as water, require specific attention in winter.
If water intake is limited by freezing or cold
Table 7-7. Eftect of Body Condition Score at Calving on Reproductive
Performance
Body condition at calving
4 or less 5 6 or more
Trial 1
Percent in heat within 80 days
after calving 62 88 98
Trial 2
Percent pregnant after 60 days 69 80
Trial 3
Percent pregnant after 60 days 24 60 87
Trial 4
Percent pregnant after 180 days 12 50 90
Trial 5
Percent pregnant after 60 days 70 90 92
Adapted from Herd and Sprott, 1986. Body Condition, Nutrition, and Reproduction
of Beef Cows. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. B-1526.
Table 7-8. Body Condition Score 90 to 100 Days Prior to Calving
Desired
score
Score at calving Recommendation
3 5 Needs to gain 200 to 300 lb
4 5 Needs to gain 150 to 200 lb
5 5-6 Needs to gain weight of fetus (100 lb)
6 5-6 Needs to gain weight of fetus (100 lb)
7 5-7 No weight gain needed
8 5-7 Can probably lose 50 to 150 lb
Adapted from Beverly 19B5. Reproduction in beef cattle as related to
nutrition and body condition. Proceedings, Kentucky Beef Cattle Roundup,
pages 1-12. Lexington: University of Kentucky
weather, feed intake, especially of hay, decreases. Producers must keep
water sources open in the winter and, if p05sible, above 400F for maximum
feed intake.
We earlier described vitamin A as critical. This is especially true in
winter. Cows consuming high fiber, low quality hay and coming out of a
hard winter will have used most of the vitamin A in their bodies. Supplement
the vitamin in the winter by either feeding or injecting.
The greatest out-of-pocket expense for winter feeding is generally protein
supplementation. Test your forage for protein content before you add a
protein supplement. If a supplement is needed, don't purchase on price
alone. Instead, purchase a supplement that is useful; that is, one high
in natural protein. High NPN supplements have limited usefulness for cows
being wintered on low quality hays.
Before winter, give yourself time to make decisions by estimating whether
an adequate quantity of feed is available to meet animal needs. Table
7-5 shows sample rations for various classes of beef cattle. Multiply
the appropriate ration by 120 (approximate number of days in winter) and
the number of cattle you have to estimate the amount of winter feed you
will need.
If forage supply is inadequate for the entire feeding period, you can
substitute concentrates for forages. One pound of corn contains the same
amount of energy (TDN) as 1.5 pounds of good hay or 2 pounds of medium
quality hay. When hay is in short supply, grains might be a cheaper source
of nutrients. Use ground corn as a carrier for magnesium or vitamin A
when needed.
Feed costs represent the greatest single expense in calf production.
Managing to keep feed costs low and production levels high will improve
your profitability.
Creep Feeding Beef Calves
Creep feeding is the practice of supplying supplemental feed to the nursing
calf without the cow being able to get to the feed. After a calf is 90
to 120 days of age, cow's milk only supplies about 50 percent of the nutrients
it needs for maximum growth. The other nutrients have to come from somewhere
else if the calf is to realize its genetic potential for growth. High
quality pasture is the best source of nutrients; if this is unavailable
or inadequate, you can use creep feeding.
Creep feeding the nursing calf increases its rate of gain and weaning
weight. Expect increases in gain of .10 to .25 pounds/day. You must determine
if the increased rate of gain will be profitable. To do this, consider
the conversion rate, or the pounds of creep feed needed to produce a pound
of gain. Conversion rates may range from 3-to-I to 18-to-1. For high energy
creep feeds, use a 10-to-1 conversion rate as a rule of thumb. Table7-9
gives the cost of additional gain at various conversion rates and feed
costs.
You have to base your decision on your own operation, but you will generally
find that creep feeding is profitable under the following circumstances:
long periods of dry weather or drought, poor milking cows, large numbers
of first calf heifers or very old cows in the herd, late calvers (such
as midsummer), fall-born calves, only low quality pasture available, and
periods of low feed costs and high calf prices.
Table 7-9. Cost ($/cwt) of Extra Gain from Creep Feeding
Feed cost ($/cwt)
Feed/pound
extra gain 5 6 7 8 9
6 30 36 42 48 54
8 40 48 56 64 72
10 50 60 70 80 90
12 60 72 84 96 108
Creep feeding may not be beneficial under these situations: good milking
cows; abundant, high-quality pasture; high feed costs and low calf prices; weaned calves kept to yearling
weights; and heifers kept as replacement females. Creep feeding can be
detrimental to replacement females. Fat can be deposited in the mammary
gland, permanently reducing the heifer's ability to produce milk. Creep
feeding also can "mask" the presence of poor milking dams and
may make performance records difficult to analyze.
Creep rations do not have to be complex, but they should be economical
and palatable. No matter how good a ration might be, if calves don't eat
it, they won't gain more. You can use wet molasses or distiller's dried
grains to enhance consumption. For example, a creep ration that is 12
percent crude protein could be 67.5 percent shelled corn, 22.5 percent
oats, 5 percent soybean meal, and 5 percent distiller's dried grains.
If consumption is not adequate, substitute wet molasses for 3 percent
to 5 percent of the corn. If possible, process the grains by coarse grinding
or cracking. When only grain is being used as the creep ration, it is
useful to roll the grain. You may substitute other grains or grain products
for the corn and oats. High quality commercial creep feeds are available,
and you might find that purchasing these is your best choice.
Starting calves on creep rations is sometimes difficult. One of the best
starting methods is to feed their mothers small amounts of ground feed
for a few days prior to beginning creep feeding. The calf learns to eat
with its mother and can soon be switched to the creep.
Limit-fed, high protein creep rations have drawn attention recently.
These types of creep rations may be useful with large framed, rapidly
growing calves that have greater than normal protein needs. The benefit
can be increased gain without excessive fattening due to excessive energy
intake. Monitor daily creep intake to be sure it does not exceed 1.5 pounds.
Conversion rates should be no greater than 5 pounds of high protein creep
to 1 pound of calf gain for this to be profitable.
Creep grazing is basically the same as creep feeding. The calf has access
to higher quality forage, while the cow does not. Control access with
creep gates constructed so that calves can pass through but cows cannot
(from 15 to 18 inches wide and 36 to 40 inches high), or raise an electric
fence that permits calves to walk under it but restricts cows.
Feed Additives for Beef Cows
Feed additives are either nutritive or non-nutritive compounds that improve
performance and/or feed efficiency or act as a disease preventative when
consumed in feed. If you properly use feed additives, you can greatly
improve the profitability of your beef cattle operation.
You have the responsibility to use feed additives properly. This means:
using the feed additive for its intended purpose
following the feeding guidelines and any warning statement on the label
storing feed properly
observing any withdrawal time when necessary
Most feed additives fall into one of six broad categories: rumen fermentation
modifiers, antibiotics, hormone or hormone-like products, anthelmintics,
buffers, and coccidiostats. Other products that are approved for use in
feed but do not fit the broad categories will be discussed as general
additives. Additives in each category that apply to the beef cow are discussed
below.
Rumen fermentation modifiers (which include the ionophores) alter microbial
fermentation in the rumen, thereby allowing cattle to obtain more energy
from the feed consumed. Products currently available are Rumensin®
(monensin), Bovatec® (lasalocid), GAINPROTM (bambermycin), and Cattlyst®
(laidlomycin). These products are most commonly used for increased weight
gain and improved feed efficiency for cattle fed in confinement or increased
rate of weight gain for pasture cattle. Rumensin is also approved for
increased feed efficiency in mature reproducing beef cows. All products
have various label claims and are available in different forms of feed.
Instructions for use of rumen fermentation modifiers are found on feed
tags of commercial feeds that contain them.
Antibiotics are generally added to the feed of growing and finishing
cattle, but most may also be used with the beef cow when necessary. They
are normally used at continuous low levels for an improvement in rate
of gain and feed efficiency. Antibiotics may be used at higher levels
for prevention and treatment of diseases such as the bovine respiratory
complex, anaplasmosis, and pinkeye.
Use care when feeding antibiotics. Recommended levels give the desired
results; too much can interfere with rumen function and actually decrease
performance.
Many anthelmintics, or dewormers, are available in feed forms. Dewormers
are generally administered directly to the animal, but, when handling
is a problem, feeding can be an acceptable method. Products may be mixed
into meal feed, or they are commercially available as cubes or pellets.
Some products are also available in block form and as loose minerals.
Check with a local feed or animal health dealer to find products available
in your area.
Other products are approved as feed additives for specific purposes.
These include products to prevent bloat when cattle are grazing lush legume
pastures and fly control products that act as growth regulators or as
a larvacide (also available in feed forms).
Remember, feed additives are controlled by the Food and Drug Administration,
and you have the responsibility to use these products properly. For more
information and a listing of common products, refer to Kentucky Cooperative
Extension Service publication ASC-l23, 'Feed Additives for Beef Cattle."
Feeding Management During Drought
The effect that drought and the ensuing pasture shortage have on the
beef herd largely depends on when the drought occurs. For example, if
drought conditions occur in late spring and early summer (June and July),
production is decreased in both the current year and the subsequent one.
Producers must deal with decreased weaning weights and understand that
the rebreeding of the spring-calving cow herd is in jeopardy. Managing
the cows for adequate rebreeding is a primary concern. If the same conditions
were to occur in late summer, the cows should already be pregnant and
the calves closer to weaning age.
These are options to consider when deciding what to do in a drought situation:
early-weaning calves, feeding the cow herd, creep feeding calves, "stretching"
the forage supply, marketing a portion of the herd, or implementing various
combinations of these options.
Early weaning has been successfully used on calves as young as 35 days
of age to encourage cows to cycle and rebreed earlier during periods of
drought or when body condition is poor. It is a fairly common practice
for first calf heifers, which are more likely to have poor rebreeding
performance. Weaning calves at 3 to 5 months of age is also a viable alternative
when forages are scarce and milk production is low, but this is too late
to assist early cycling. Consider early weaning when cows milk poorly,
calf growth is below normal, and cows are likely to experience poor reproductive
performance.
Before you wean calves early, make plans to handle the calves based on
their age and the available feed supply. In some situations, you might
need to sell early-weaned calves. However, this is not usually a good
option since calves are lightweight and the market is depressed during
a widespread drought. The long-term considerations might be more important
than the present economic situation (that is, high feed prices). Early
weaning eliminates the nutrient needs for milk production, thus freeing
up more energy for maintenance and reproduction. Removing the suckling
calf also causes hormonal changes in the cow that stimulate estrus (heat).
The first two weeks are the most critical time in the early weaning period.
Calves must overcome the stress of weaning and learn to eat/drink quickly.
The first ration should be very palatable and high in protein and energy,
since intake at first is small. Place calves in a small pen with shelter
available. The feed bunk and water source should be accessible and easily
recognizable to small calves.
Place feed bunks perpendicular to fences, and allow water troughs to
overflow to attract calves. Vaccinate all calves for blackleg and malignant
edema.
Several commercial starter/conditioning feeds are available, or you can
have feed mixed locally. The diet should be high in natural protein (13
percent to 15 percent) and energy (70 percent to 75 percent TDN), with
adequate minerals and vitamins. It should also contain an antibiotic or
coccidiostat.
Some problems to look for during drylot rearing of calves are respiratory
problems, especially seven to 14 days after weaning; sorting of the feed,
which can lead to founder; coccidiosis; and scouring. If calves become
fleshy or scour, increase the roughage content of the ration or cut back
on the amount fed. Remember that early-weaned calves are started on a
diet high in energy and protein and should be gradually changed to a grower-type
ration as their intake increases.
Early weaning permits high conception rates and rapid rebreeding. Although
it is not recommended as a standard practice. it can be useful in times
of drought when purchased feed may be more efficiently fed directly to
the calf than to the lactating cow.
Kentucky research shows that weights at normal weaning time were 508
pounds for early-weaned and fed calves compared to 463 pounds for calves
reared on dams that were fed. If supplemental feed for the cow herd had
not been available during drought, early weaning or selling the calves
would have been the only choices.
Feeding the cows is an option if early weaning is too drastic, requires
too much management, or isn't needed because an economical source of feed
is available. The amount of feed needed varies with cow size, stage of
production, and amount of feed being supplied from pastures. As an example,
the nutrient needs of an 1,100-pound cow during the first three to four
months of lactation could be met with 20 to 25 pounds of good quality
hay (minimum 55 percent TDN; 10 percent protein) with mineral/vitamin
supplementation. Heavy-milking cows require another 3 to 5 pounds of grain.
If cows are getting some portion of this from pasture, feeding can be
reduced.
If the cow herd is still in the breeding season, it is desirable to supplement
with good hay instead of saving it for winter." Protein supplementation
can help increase digestion and intake of roughage, but energy is the
greatest need. Therefore, some grain or better quality hay might be needed
for high-producing cows. Vitamin A should be supplied in the mineral/vitamin
supplement since it is likely to be lacking in "dried" forage
(pasture or hay).
When pastures are short and the corn crop has little grain due to drought,
producers frequently decide to green chop the damaged corn and feed it
directly. This can be extremely dangerous. Drought-stricken corn fed as
green chop, whether grazed or baled, carries a high risk of nitrate toxicity.
Nitrate level in forage can be checked, but it changes constantly. The
safest use of drought-stricken corn is to ensile it and wait six to eight
weeks before feeding it. Although this does not help your immediate feed
shortage, it will cause the corn stalk to lose 40 percent to 60 percent
of its nitrate content and provide a safe feed for later use.
Sorghum and sorghum-cross plants used for temporary summer pasture are
also potentially dangerous during drought due to their prussic acid contents.
These plants should not be grazed during or shortly after drought periods
when they are stunted or wilted.
Creep feeding (see earlier discussion in this section) may have extra
merit during drought. When pastures are adequate and of good quality and
cows are supplying plenty of milk to the calf, benefits may not be great
relative to the added cost. However, when pastures are poor during a drought,
the increase in gain should be greater.
Balancing Rations
Feed costs are the major component of the total cost of producing a feeder
calf. Feeding cattle a balanced ration prevents wasting feed dollars and
allows the most efficient level of production.
Before you begin ration balancing, you'll need some basic information,
including definitions of terms:
Ration is the amount of feed an animal receives in a 24-hour period.
Balanced ration is a ration that supplies the proper amounts and proportions
of nutrients needed for an animal's growth, maintenance, lactation, or
gestation. Table 7-11 shows the amounts of nutrients required for beef
cattle.
Nutrient composition refers to the amounts of specific nutrients contained
in the feed. It is expressed as a percentage of the dry matter and may
also be looked up in a feed composition table (see Table 7-12). These
tables contain only average values; your feed will be represented only
if it is average. For accurate information, you'll need a nutrient analysis
on stored forages; this can easily be done for a reasonable cost.
Dry matter is the portion of feed left after all water has been removed.
It contains the nutrients. Levels of dry matter intake for animals are
shown in the requirement tables. These amounts are not all an animal will
consume, but they represent an amount that can be consumed under normal
circumstances. Different feeds contain different levels of dry matter;
therefore, it is desirable to balance the ration on a dry matter basis
and then convert the various feeds back to an as-fed basis.
Table 7-10. Nutrient Composition of Various Feedstuffs, Dry Matter Basis*
% %
Feed Dry matter TDN Protein Ca P
Fescue hay 92 48 9.5 .3 .26
Shelled corn 88 90 10.1 .02 .35
Soybean meal 89 84 49.9 .33 .71
Dry Crude protein TDN
Daily matter % of % of
Body wt.,lb gain, lb intake, lb lb/day D.M. lb/day D.M. Ca,% R%
Steer calves (medium-frame)
400 1.5 10.8 1.24 11.5 6.8 63.0 .47 .25
400 2.0 11.0 1.41 12.7 7.5 67.5 .56 .26
400 2.5 11.0 1.56 14.2 8.1 73.5 .68 .30
500 1.5 12.8 1.33 10.5 8.1 63.0 .40 .22
500 2.0 13.1 1.49 11.4 8.9 67.5 .47 .24
500 2.5 13.0 1.63 12.5 9.6 73.5 .56 .27
600 1.5 14.7 1.42 9.8 9.3 63.0 .35 .21
600 2.0 15.0 1.57 10.5 10.2 67.5 .40 .22
~00 2.5 14.0 1.69 11.4 11.0 73.5 .46 .24
Heifer calves
400 1.5 10.2 1.17 11.4 7.0 68.5 .45 .24
500 1.5 12.1 1.25 10.3 8.3 68.5 .38 .22
600 1.5 13.8 1.32 9.5 9.4 68.5 .32 .21
Pregnant yearling heifers-last third of pregnancy
750 1.4 16.6 1.5
850 0.9 17.6 1.4
950 0.9 19.0 1.5
8.9 10.0 59.9 .32 .21
8.2 9.6 54.5 .26 .20
8.0 10.3 54.1 .27 .20
Dry pregnant mature cows-middle third of pregnancy
1,000 - - - 18.1 1.3 7.0 8.8 48.8 .18 .18
1,100 -- 19.5 1.4 7.0 9.5 48.8 .19 .19
1,200 - - - 20.8 1.4 6.9 10.1 48.8 .19 .19
Dry pregnant mature cows-last third of pregnancy
1,000 0.9 19.6 1.6 7.9 10.5 53.6 .26 .21
1,100 0.9 21.0 1.6 7.8 11.2 53.2 .26 .21
1,200 0.9 22.3 1.7 7.8 11.8 52.9 .26 .21
Two-year-old heifers nursing calves-first 3-4 months postpartum-b lb
milk/day
800 0.5 17.6 1.9 10.8 11.2 63.8 .34 .24
900 0.5 19.2 2.0 10.4 12.0 62.7 .32 .23
1,000 0.5 20.8 2.1 10.0 12.9 61.9 .31 .23
Cows nursing calves-first 3-4 months postpartum-average miJking (10 lb/day)
1,000 -- 20.2 2.0 9.6 11.5 56.6 .28 .22
1,100 - - - 21.6 2.0 9.4 12.1 56.0 .27 .22
1,200 - - - 23.0 2.1 9.3 12.8 55.5 .27 .22
Cows nursing calves-first 3-4 months postpartum-superior milking (20
lb/day)
1,000 - - - 20.6 2.5 12.3 13.8 67.0 .39 .27
1,100 - - - 22.3 2.6 11.9 14.5 65.2 .83 .27
1,200 - - - 23.8 2.7 11.5 15.2 63.7 .36 .26
Bulls-maintenance and slow rate of growth (regain condition)
1,400 2.0 27.7 2.2 8.0 17.8 64.0 .25 .20
1,600 1.0 29.7 2.2 7.3 16.6 55.8 .22 .19
1,800 0.5 30.9 2.2 7.0 16.1 52.0 .20 .20
Note: Vitamin A for.
(1) pregnant heifers and cows-l,270 IU per lb dry feed
(2) lactating cows and breeding bulls~l, 770 IU per lb dry teed
Source: Reprinted with permission from "Nutrition Requirements ot
Beet Cattle," 6th revised edition, c. 1984 by the National Academy
of Sciences. Published by National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
A systematic approach helps in ration balancing. First, determine the
nutrient requirements of the animal. This means you have to know the animal's
type, size, and production level. Then look up the requirements in Table
7-11. Next, determine the feeds available for use. List their composition
on a dry matter basis from a composition table (such as Table 7-12) or
a chemical analysis. Now you are ready to determine the amounts of the
feeds necessary to balance the ration.
Table 7-12. Composition of Commonly-used Feeds (dry matter basis)
% Dry
Feed stuff matter %TDN %CP %Ca %P
Alfalfa hay, midbloom 90 58 17.0 1.41 .24
Alfalfa hay, late bloom 90 52 14.0 1.43 .25
Barley grain 88 84 13.5 .05 .38
Bluegrass hay 89 56 13.0 .33 .16
Crimson clover hay 87 57 18.4 1.40 .22
Ladino clover hay 90 60 22.0 1.35 .31
Red clover hay 89 55 16.0 1.53 .25
Corn, yellow 88 90 10.1 .02 .35
Corn, yellow, high-moisture 72 93 10.7 .02 .32
Corn stover 85 50 6.6 .57 .10
Ground ear corn 87 83 9.0 .07 .27
Corn silage (few ears) 29 62 8.4 .34 .19
Corn silage (well-earred) 33 70 8.1 .23 .22
Corn, distiller's grain (dehy.) 94 86 23.0 .11 .43
Fescue hay, early veg. 91 61 12.4 .51 .36
Fescue hay, early bloom 92 48 9.5 .30 .26
Lespedeza hay, midbloom 93 50 14.5 1.20 .25
Molasses (syrup) 78 79 8.5 .17 .03
Oats 89 77 13.3 .07 .38
Orchardgrass hay, early bloom 89 65 15.0 .27 .34
Orchardgrass hay, late bloom 91 54 8.4 .26 .30
Sorghum stover 88 54 5.2 .52 .13
Sorghum grain (milo), 8%-10% CP 87 84 10.1 .04 .34
Sorghum silage 30 60 7.5 .35 .21
Sorghum sudangrass hay 91 56 8.0 .55 .30
Sorghum johnsongrass hay 89 53 9.5 .84 .28
Soybean meal (44%) 89 84 49.9 .33 .71
Timothy hay, midbloom 89 57 9.1 .48 .22
Urea (45% nitrogen) 99 0 287.0 0 0
Wheat 89 88 16.0 .04 .42
Wheat hay 88 58 8.5 .15 .20
Wheat silage, full bloom 25 59 8.1 .15 .20
Wheat straw 89 41 3.6 .18 .05
Mineral Sources
Dicalcium phosphate 97 22.0 19.3
Ground limestone 100 39.4
Steamed bone meal 97 8.4 15 31.5 14.2
Sodium tripolyphosphate 96 25.0
Source: Reprinted with permission from 'Nutrition Requirements of Beef
Cattle," 6th revised
edition, c. 1984 by the National Academy of Sciences. Published by National
Academy
Press, Washington, D.C.
Using the Pearson Square
A relatively simple technique of ration balancing involves using the
"Pearson Square." This square is used to determine the proportions
of two feed materials needed to create a feed of the desired nutrient
level. It can only be used for two feed materials; however, one or both
of those can be mixtures.
The following example will help explain the Pearson Square method. In
this example, a ration will be balanced for a 500-pound steer calf having
a desired gain of 2.0 pounds per day. The daily requirements (from Table
7-11) are:
13.1 lb dry matter intake
11.4% crude protein
67.5% TDN
The feeds available in this example and their compositions are shown
in Table 7-10. Values for their compositions came from Table 7-12.
The animal requires a 67.5 percent TDN ration. Place 67.5 in the center
of a square. Place the TDN values of fescue (48 percent) and corn (90
percent) on the left side of the square and subtract diagonally, smallest
from largest. Now, add the two numbers on the right side of the square.
The numbers on the right side show that 22.5 parts of fescue and 19.5
parts of corn would give a 67.5 percent TDN mixture. This would be a total
of 42 parts. Divide these two numbers (22.5 and 19.5) by the total (42)
to determine the preliminary percentages of fescue and corn in the ration.
fescue 22.5 + 42 = .54 (54%)
corn 19.5 + 42 = .46 (46%)
The next step is to determine the percentage of crude protein in this
fescue-corn mixture. Multiply the percentage of each ingredient in the
mix by its crude protein content. Fescue is 54 percent of the mix and
contains 9.5 percent crude protein. Corn is 46 percent of the mix and
contains 10.1 percent crude protein.
Fescue 54x9.5 = 5.1%
Corn .46 x 10.1 = 4.6%
9.7%
The crude protein content of the mix is 9.7 percent. The animal requires
11.4 percent. Therefore, the crude protein content needs to be increased
by adding a protein supplement. Use the square method again to balance
the fescue corn mix with soybean meal (SBM) to obtain an 11.4 percent
crude protein mixture (see below). Place 11.4 in the center of the square
and 9.7 and 49.9 on the left side, and subtract as before. Add the two
figures on the right side of the square (38.5 and 1.7) to determine the
total parts of the ration (40.2). Divide each of the numbers by the total
to determine the percentages of fescue-corn (95.8 percent) and soybean
meal (4.2 percent).
12.55 x .54 = 6.77 lb dry matter from fescue
1~.55 -6.77 = 5.78 lb dry matter trom corn
Next, convert each ingredient from dry matter to an as-fed basis so you
know how much to actually feed. To do this, divide the pounds of dry matter
from each ingredient by the amount of dry matter in each pound of feed
(obtained from Table 7-10).
Fescue 6.77 + .92 = 7.36 pounds as fed Corn 5.78 + .88 = 6.57 pounds
as fed SBM 0.55 + .89 = 0.62 pounds as fed
Minerals are generally supplied by free-choice supplementation with commercial
mineral supplements or "homemade" mixes. Calculate mineral levels
by multiplying the dry matter pounds of each feed by that feed's calcium
and phosphorus contents and adding the results. Compare the results to
the animal's needs.
Supplementing Cows Receiving Free-choice Hay
Again, you must determine the nutrient requirement of the animal. In
this example, use an 1,100-pound cow nursing a calf, in the first three
to four months postpartum, with average milking ability (from Table 7-11):
Drv matter intake. lb Crude protein. lb TDN.lb
21.6 2.0 12.1
If fescue hay is being fed and corn and soybean meal are available, list
their compositions next (from Table 7-12)
Dry Matter TDN Protein
Fescue hay (early bloom) 92% 48% 9.5%
Corn 88% 90% 10.1%
Soybean meal 89% 84% 49.9%
Dry matter intake, lb x value for SBM = SBM dry matter, lb (13.1 x .042
= 0.55)
Subtract this amount (0.55) from the dry matter intake (13.1) to determine
how much dry matter will come from the fescue-corn mixture.
(13.1-0.55 = 12.55)
There should he 12.55 pounds of fescue-corn on a dry matter basis.
To determine the amounts of dry matter each of fescue and corn, multiply
12.55 by the relative amounts of fescue and corn obtained in the first
square (.54 fescue and .46 corn).
Since you are interested in using as much hay as possible, begin by assuming
the cow will consume her dry matter requirement (21.6 pounds) from fescue
hay. This will be 23.5 pounds of actual hay (21.6 pounds of dry matter
divided by .92).
Next, calculate nutrients supplied by 21.6 pounds of hay (dry matter
basis):
TDN = 21.6 x .48 = 10.4 lb Protein = 21.6 x .095 = 2.1 lb
Now, see how 21.6 pounds of hay on a dry matter basis (23.5 pounds as-fed)
matches up to the animal's requirements:
Protein TDN
Required 2.0 12.1
Firnished 2.1 10.4
(OK) minus 1.7 lb TDN
An addition of corn grain for extra energy is needed. If 21.6 pounds
of dry matter from fescue is all the cow can consume, corn must be substituted
for fescue. One pound of fescue dry matter contains .48 pounds of TDN,
while one pound of corn contains .90 pounds of TDN. The net effect of
replacing one pound of fescue with one pound of corn is a gain of .42
pounds of TDN (.90 - .48 = .42).
Since a deficiency of 1.7 pounds of TDN exists, divide this by .42 to
get the pounds of dry matter to substitute.
1.7 + .42 = 4.0
Now, the ration is 17.6 pounds (21.6 - 4.0) of fescue and 4 pounds of
corn on a dry basis. Divide each by its dry matter content to convert
to an as-fed basis.
17.6 + .92 = 19.1 lb of fescue
4.0 + .88 = 4.5 lb of corn
Animals will gain more efficiently with a balanced ration. Using the
guidelines should enable you to balance rations for your cow-calf operation.
The Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service can help you obtain forage
analyses and ration balancing.
- Reprinted
with permission of Texas Longhorn Trails Magazine
-
and/or TLBAA (Texas Longhorn Breeders Association of
America)
Lucky S&L Ranch P.O. Box 18757 Corpus Christi, TX
78480-8757
Phone: (361) 949-7197(H) or (361) 949-6919(O) Fax:
(361) 949-7405
|
|
|